Melissa Harris writes in the Baltimore Sun,
Experts on voting say Maryland is one of the states most at risk for Election Day failures as it tries to recover from a glitch-filled primary amid one of the fiercest political seasons in decades.
Maryland’s problems - like those facing several other states and many counties nationwide - stem from a reliance on among the most sophisticated election systems in the country, manufactured by Diebold Election Systems Inc., one of two leading companies in the industry.
“The analogy I like to use is retrofitting an old car - right now the country is putting 2006 parts on a 1950 Chevy,” said Gracia M. Hillman, a member of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, the agency created by Congress to help execute the Help America Vote Act of 2002. “You have to have a very detailed manual, step by step, to work these machines. And the last time I put together something with a manual, I had a glass of wine and wasn’t in a hurry. I didn’t have several hundred people waiting in line.”
Tova Wang, who studies elections for the nonpartisan Century Foundation, said that states have learned from Florida to avoid punch-cards and hanging chads, but also have moved away from electronic voting machines that don’t allow recounts - such as Maryland’s.
After taking office in 2002, Republican Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. repeatedly expressed support for Diebold, while also criticizing elections chief Linda H. Lamone, a holdover from the previous Democratic administration. At the time, Diebold had links to the Republican Party - the then-CEO of its parent company had declared in a fundraising letter that he would deliver the state of Ohio to President Bush in 2004.
Over the past year, Ehrlich has increasingly become a Diebold critic as he faces a tough re-election challenge, arguing that the company’s equipment was susceptible to hacking. Members of the governor’s staff have said that updated research by computer scientists demonstrating vulnerabilities in the systems drove the switch.












